Forum de l'union médicale: Tunisie,Algérie,Maroc

Soyez le bienvenu sur FUMED (Forum de l'Union Médicale).

Cell Phones Possibly Carcinogenic, WHO Says ! Fumed10


Rejoignez le forum, c’est rapide et facile

Forum de l'union médicale: Tunisie,Algérie,Maroc

Soyez le bienvenu sur FUMED (Forum de l'Union Médicale).

Cell Phones Possibly Carcinogenic, WHO Says ! Fumed10

Forum de l'union médicale: Tunisie,Algérie,Maroc

Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.

Espace de discussion scientifique pour les praticiens médicaux et para-médicaux des pays maghrébins francophones (Algérie, Tunisie, Maroc)

Do you like FUMED

Connexion

Récupérer mon mot de passe








Derniers sujets













Pour établir un PARTENARIAT avec FUMED contactez l'administration du forum en cliquant ici:




 free counters
Le Deal du moment :
LEGO Icons 10331 – Le martin-pêcheur
Voir le deal
35 €

    Cell Phones Possibly Carcinogenic, WHO Says !

    MIRAGE
    MIRAGE
    Admin
    Admin


    Masculin Messages : 2277
    Date d'inscription : 16/08/2009
    Age : 38
    Localisation : Maghreb united
    Emploi : Medical student

    Cell Phones Possibly Carcinogenic, WHO Says ! Empty Cell Phones Possibly Carcinogenic, WHO Says !

    Message par MIRAGE Mer 01 Juin 2011, 12:11

    May 31, 2011 —

    The World Health Organization (WHO) announced today
    that radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer. According to
    the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),
    radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have been classified as possibly
    carcinogenic to humans (group 2B) on the basis of an increased risk for
    glioma that some studies have associated with the use of wireless
    phones.
    This announcement was based on an extensive review of studies on
    cell phone safety by a working group of 31 scientists from 14
    countries, who have been meeting regularly to evaluate the potential
    carcinogenic hazards from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic
    fields. They reviewed exposure data, studies of cancer in humans and
    experimental animal models, and other relevant data.
    More specifically, the IARC Monograph Working Group discussed and
    evaluated literature that included several exposure categories
    involving radiofrequency electromagnetic fields:

    • Occupational exposures to radar and to microwaves;
    • Environmental exposures associated with transmission of signals for radio, television, and wireless telecommunication; and
    • Personal exposures associated with the use of wireless telephones.

    "Given the potential consequences for public health of this
    classification and findings," said IARC Director Christopher Wild, PhD,
    in a news release, "it is important that additional research be
    conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the
    availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic
    measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or texting."
    Inconsistent Data and Opinions

    Cellular telephones have become an integral part of everyday life,
    and the number of users is estimated at 5 billion globally. However, as
    previously reported by Medscape Medical News,
    there has been growing concern over possible health risks associated
    with the use of cell phones. In particular, some data have suggested
    that their use, especially over the long term, represent a
    "significant" risk for brain tumors.
    But study results have been inconsistent, although some European
    countries have taken precautionary measures aimed specifically at
    children.
    Some of the strongest evidence supporting a link between brain
    tumors and cell phone use comes from a series of Swedish studies, led
    by Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, from the Department of Oncology, Orebro
    Medical Center. These studies showed that risk increased with the
    number of cumulative hours of use, higher radiated power, and length of
    cell phone use. They also reported that younger users had a higher
    risk. (Int J Oncol. 2006;28:509-518; Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:630-639; Arch Environ Health. 2004;59:132-137; Pathophysiology. 2009;16:113-122).
    The issue of cell phone safety was to have been settled once and for
    all by the huge 13-nation industry-funded Interphone study. But to
    date, the industry-funded Interphone studies found no increased risk
    for brain tumors from cell phone use, with only 4 exceptions. The
    findings contradicted the Swedish studies, which were independent of
    industry funding.
    Consistent with the literature, there is no consensus among
    physicians and scientists about the severity of risk, or if one even
    exists. One issue in attempting to evaluate the potential connection
    between brain tumors and cell phone use is the relatively short period
    of time that these devices have been heavily used in a large population
    and the long latency period for many tumors.
    The National Cancer Institute, for example, has stated that although a consistent link has not been established
    between cell phone use and cancer, "scientists feel that additional
    research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn." In a similar
    fashion, the American Cancer Society points out that even though the
    weight of the evidence has shown no association between cell phone use
    and brain cancer, information on the potential health effects of very
    long-term use, or use in children, is simply not available.
    Evidence Strong Enough

    The WHO established the International Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
    Project in 1996, in response to public and governmental concern, with
    the goal of evaluating the possibility of adverse health effects from
    electromagnetic fields. In a press release
    issued last year, the WHO stated that it would conduct a formal health
    risk assessment of radiofrequency fields exposure by 2012, but in the
    interim, the IARC would review the carcinogenic potential of mobile
    phones this year.
    Jonathan Samet, MD, chairman of the working group, notes that "the
    evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a
    conclusion and the 2B classification.
    "The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore
    we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer
    risk," he said in a news release.
    A full report summarizing the main conclusions and evaluations of
    the IARC Working Group is slated to be published online soon in The Lancet Oncology and in print in its July 1 issue.source :Medescape

      La date/heure actuelle est Sam 23 Nov 2024, 10:47