May 31, 2011 —
The World Health Organization (WHO) announced today
that radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer. According to
the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have been classified as possibly
carcinogenic to humans (group 2B) on the basis of an increased risk for
glioma that some studies have associated with the use of wireless
phones.
This announcement was based on an extensive review of studies on
cell phone safety by a working group of 31 scientists from 14
countries, who have been meeting regularly to evaluate the potential
carcinogenic hazards from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic
fields. They reviewed exposure data, studies of cancer in humans and
experimental animal models, and other relevant data.
More specifically, the IARC Monograph Working Group discussed and
evaluated literature that included several exposure categories
involving radiofrequency electromagnetic fields:
"Given the potential consequences for public health of this
classification and findings," said IARC Director Christopher Wild, PhD,
in a news release, "it is important that additional research be
conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the
availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic
measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or texting."
Inconsistent Data and Opinions
Cellular telephones have become an integral part of everyday life,
and the number of users is estimated at 5 billion globally. However, as
previously reported by Medscape Medical News,
there has been growing concern over possible health risks associated
with the use of cell phones. In particular, some data have suggested
that their use, especially over the long term, represent a
"significant" risk for brain tumors.
But study results have been inconsistent, although some European
countries have taken precautionary measures aimed specifically at
children.
Some of the strongest evidence supporting a link between brain
tumors and cell phone use comes from a series of Swedish studies, led
by Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, from the Department of Oncology, Orebro
Medical Center. These studies showed that risk increased with the
number of cumulative hours of use, higher radiated power, and length of
cell phone use. They also reported that younger users had a higher
risk. (Int J Oncol. 2006;28:509-518; Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:630-639; Arch Environ Health. 2004;59:132-137; Pathophysiology. 2009;16:113-122).
The issue of cell phone safety was to have been settled once and for
all by the huge 13-nation industry-funded Interphone study. But to
date, the industry-funded Interphone studies found no increased risk
for brain tumors from cell phone use, with only 4 exceptions. The
findings contradicted the Swedish studies, which were independent of
industry funding.
Consistent with the literature, there is no consensus among
physicians and scientists about the severity of risk, or if one even
exists. One issue in attempting to evaluate the potential connection
between brain tumors and cell phone use is the relatively short period
of time that these devices have been heavily used in a large population
and the long latency period for many tumors.
The National Cancer Institute, for example, has stated that although a consistent link has not been established
between cell phone use and cancer, "scientists feel that additional
research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn." In a similar
fashion, the American Cancer Society points out that even though the
weight of the evidence has shown no association between cell phone use
and brain cancer, information on the potential health effects of very
long-term use, or use in children, is simply not available.
Evidence Strong Enough
The WHO established the International Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
Project in 1996, in response to public and governmental concern, with
the goal of evaluating the possibility of adverse health effects from
electromagnetic fields. In a press release
issued last year, the WHO stated that it would conduct a formal health
risk assessment of radiofrequency fields exposure by 2012, but in the
interim, the IARC would review the carcinogenic potential of mobile
phones this year.
Jonathan Samet, MD, chairman of the working group, notes that "the
evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a
conclusion and the 2B classification.
"The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore
we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer
risk," he said in a news release.
A full report summarizing the main conclusions and evaluations of
the IARC Working Group is slated to be published online soon in The Lancet Oncology and in print in its July 1 issue.source :Medescape
The World Health Organization (WHO) announced today
that radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer. According to
the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields have been classified as possibly
carcinogenic to humans (group 2B) on the basis of an increased risk for
glioma that some studies have associated with the use of wireless
phones.
This announcement was based on an extensive review of studies on
cell phone safety by a working group of 31 scientists from 14
countries, who have been meeting regularly to evaluate the potential
carcinogenic hazards from exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic
fields. They reviewed exposure data, studies of cancer in humans and
experimental animal models, and other relevant data.
More specifically, the IARC Monograph Working Group discussed and
evaluated literature that included several exposure categories
involving radiofrequency electromagnetic fields:
- Occupational exposures to radar and to microwaves;
- Environmental exposures associated with transmission of signals for radio, television, and wireless telecommunication; and
- Personal exposures associated with the use of wireless telephones.
"Given the potential consequences for public health of this
classification and findings," said IARC Director Christopher Wild, PhD,
in a news release, "it is important that additional research be
conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the
availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic
measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or texting."
Inconsistent Data and Opinions
Cellular telephones have become an integral part of everyday life,
and the number of users is estimated at 5 billion globally. However, as
previously reported by Medscape Medical News,
there has been growing concern over possible health risks associated
with the use of cell phones. In particular, some data have suggested
that their use, especially over the long term, represent a
"significant" risk for brain tumors.
But study results have been inconsistent, although some European
countries have taken precautionary measures aimed specifically at
children.
Some of the strongest evidence supporting a link between brain
tumors and cell phone use comes from a series of Swedish studies, led
by Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, from the Department of Oncology, Orebro
Medical Center. These studies showed that risk increased with the
number of cumulative hours of use, higher radiated power, and length of
cell phone use. They also reported that younger users had a higher
risk. (Int J Oncol. 2006;28:509-518; Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:630-639; Arch Environ Health. 2004;59:132-137; Pathophysiology. 2009;16:113-122).
The issue of cell phone safety was to have been settled once and for
all by the huge 13-nation industry-funded Interphone study. But to
date, the industry-funded Interphone studies found no increased risk
for brain tumors from cell phone use, with only 4 exceptions. The
findings contradicted the Swedish studies, which were independent of
industry funding.
Consistent with the literature, there is no consensus among
physicians and scientists about the severity of risk, or if one even
exists. One issue in attempting to evaluate the potential connection
between brain tumors and cell phone use is the relatively short period
of time that these devices have been heavily used in a large population
and the long latency period for many tumors.
The National Cancer Institute, for example, has stated that although a consistent link has not been established
between cell phone use and cancer, "scientists feel that additional
research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn." In a similar
fashion, the American Cancer Society points out that even though the
weight of the evidence has shown no association between cell phone use
and brain cancer, information on the potential health effects of very
long-term use, or use in children, is simply not available.
Evidence Strong Enough
The WHO established the International Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
Project in 1996, in response to public and governmental concern, with
the goal of evaluating the possibility of adverse health effects from
electromagnetic fields. In a press release
issued last year, the WHO stated that it would conduct a formal health
risk assessment of radiofrequency fields exposure by 2012, but in the
interim, the IARC would review the carcinogenic potential of mobile
phones this year.
Jonathan Samet, MD, chairman of the working group, notes that "the
evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a
conclusion and the 2B classification.
"The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore
we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer
risk," he said in a news release.
A full report summarizing the main conclusions and evaluations of
the IARC Working Group is slated to be published online soon in The Lancet Oncology and in print in its July 1 issue.source :Medescape
Aujourd'hui à 00:11 par Baaloudjo
» Pratique de l'échographie obstétricale au 1er trimestre
Hier à 15:02 par toufikflt
» L'échographie pour tous : apprentissage acceléré - de l'échoscopie a l'échographie d'expert
Hier à 14:55 par toufikflt
» les lasers en dermatologie 2018 - exclusif
Hier à 14:00 par mohsif123
» LES OSTÉOTOMIES AUTOUR DU GENOU Cahiers d'Enseignement de la SOFCOT
Hier à 13:54 par mohsif123
» Conférences d'enseignement de la SFOCOT 2019
Hier à 13:52 par mohsif123
» Manuel pratique d'anesthésie Anesthésie
Hier à 02:01 par Baaloudjo
» Collection complète DCEM en questions-réponses
Hier à 01:57 par Baaloudjo
» Télécharger EMC de Pneumologie PDF
Hier à 01:52 par Baaloudjo
» 22/03/2024 Guide d’Échographie Pratique en Anesthésie-Réanimation - GUEPAR (2e édition)
Hier à 01:45 par Baaloudjo
» LE LIVRE NOIR DES ALLERGIES #Allergologie
Hier à 01:44 par Baaloudjo
» Asthme Cas Cliniques #Allergologie
Hier à 01:43 par Baaloudjo
» PHYSIOPATHOLOGIE DE L’ASTHME #Allergologie
Hier à 01:42 par Baaloudjo
» Manuel D'échocardiographie Clinique pdf
Jeu 21 Nov 2024, 10:09 par kazran
» Livres Médicales - Cas Difficiles En Medecine Interne
Mar 19 Nov 2024, 22:15 par Sensé